Breathing emergencies and nonlinear risk
An exploratory machine learning study of response time, age, sex, and high-risk time-sensitive triage among patients with breathing problems.
Conditional risk in breathing-problem missions
The study examines how response time, age, and sex jointly shape the probability of encountering a high-risk time-sensitive condition among patients initially reported with breathing problems.
How age and waiting interact with time-sensitive risk
Older age increased conditional risk
Patients over 60 years showed consistently higher predicted probability of high-risk time-sensitive triage among breathing-problem missions.
Risk patterns were nonlinear
The analysis identified complex response-time patterns, including rising risk among older patients during prolonged waits exceeding two hours.
Interpretability before prediction
Model performance was modest and secondary. The scientific value lies in visualising how age, sex, and response time shape heterogeneous risk patterns.
Breathing problems as a high-risk dispatch phenotype
The study demonstrates how routine EMS data can reveal clinically meaningful heterogeneity within a broad dispatch category.
Study II supports a more nuanced view of response time: the safety meaning of waiting depends on patient vulnerability and presenting problem. This is especially relevant for older patients with breathing problems, where delayed reassessment may be important.
Interpretation note
This study is exploratory and observational. Machine learning is used to characterise nonlinear relationships and heterogeneity, not to provide a ready-to-use dispatch, triage, or clinical decision-support system. Prospective evaluation, human-factors design, and governance would be required before operational translation.