Adaptive EMS Allocation | Prehospital Emergency Care Research

Prehospital emergency care · EMS allocation · patient safety

Adaptive EMS Allocation

Crafting the patient safety net in prehospital emergency care through research on dispatch prioritisation, response-time variability, scarce response capacity, and system resilience.

Emergency call
Scarce capacity
Virtual waiting room
Dispatch under uncertainty
Queue governance
Response-time variability
Data-informed governance
112 Uncertain need enters the system
EMS Capacity allocated under pressure
HRTS Time-sensitive risk in context
4 Thesis studies combining qualitative and register-based research.
1.29M EMS missions in the Stockholm source database across 2017-2022.
3 Peer-reviewed articles in BMJ Open and BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.
2026 Doctoral thesis published through KI Open Archive.
Research problem

A safety net is not a response-time target.

Emergency medical services protect patients by interpreting uncertainty, preserving readiness, and allocating finite response capacity across competing needs.

Who receives help first, who can safely wait, and how does the system protect patients while certainty is still unavailable?

From speed to system behaviour

Response time remains important, but it is not a complete description of patient safety. Delays are produced by dispatch, triage, workload, geography, availability, call handling, and travel.

From triage to adaptive allocation

The research frames EMS allocation as adaptive system work: reassessment, queue governance, geographic coverage, and operational judgement under scarcity.

Published doctoral thesis

Adaptive emergency medical services allocation

Crafting the patient safety net in prehospital emergency care. Doctoral thesis, Karolinska Institutet, 2026.

Thesis contribution

The thesis examines prehospital patient safety through the EMS safety net: dispatch, triage, response-time management, queue governance, and allocation decisions that distribute delay exposure and safety margins across patients and time.

DOI: 10.69622/31262914 ISBN: 978-91-8141-015-0 124 pages 3 peer-reviewed articles 1 manuscript/preprint Defence: 24 April 2026

The thesis does not support automation claims or direct deployment of data-driven models. Operational translation requires prospective evaluation, governance, human-factors design, and safeguards.

Latest peer-reviewed publication

Study I published in BMJ Open

Stewarding scarce response capacity examines how emergency medical dispatchers prioritise patients and manage ambulance resources when system capacity is constrained.

BMJ Open Qualitative interview study Emergency medical dispatch DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118269
The research architecture

Four studies. One systems question.

Together, the studies examine how uncertainty, patient vulnerability, and operational delay mechanisms interact in prehospital emergency care.

Study I · BMJ Open

Stewarding scarce response capacity

Emergency medical dispatchers describe prioritisation under scarcity as stewardship of a safety-critical dispatch queue, balancing patient acuity, queue governance, geographic coverage, and system readiness.

Open study page
Study II · BMC MIDM

Breathing emergencies and nonlinear risk

Response time, age, and sex are examined in relation to high-risk time-sensitive conditions among breathing-problem missions.

Open study page
Study III · Preprint

Infectious presentations and concordance

Dispatch suspicion, on-scene phenotype, and time-sensitive triage are mapped in fever/infection assignments.

Open study page
Study IV · BMC MIDM

Response-time variability

Response time is modelled as an emergent systems metric shaped by workload, priority, weather, geography, and operational intervals.

Open study page
For researchers and decision-makers

Evidence for governing uncertainty

The site is a research portfolio for EMS leaders, public-sector healthcare analysts, academic collaborators, and stakeholders interested in patient safety, dispatch, triage, and adaptive allocation.